Create a logical network specification to meet system requirements
The format of a set of proposed system requirements may be varied. Most System Requirements statements designed by a business will consist of a series of desired commercially viable outcomes of the particular business' ideal system. A computer system in this context is a tool to enhance the profitability and growth of a business in a highly competitive environment. It is therefore the responsibility of the technical consultant to assess the feasibility of such requirements in consultation with management.
System requirements should treat aspects such as Performance, Distribution of Nodes, Data/Access Time, Reliability/Redundancy, Communications Load, Security and Open Systems Interface.
Items to consider when examining these are:
· Type: PC, terminal, fax, modem, printer, etc.
· Usage Level: Volume of work required
· Physical Location: Where is it to be located.
Documentation is best satisfied through a mix of graphical and tabular form. For example, a floor plan may be combined with a series of node specifications, thus identifying the needs of the business in regard to the distribution of nodes.
Evaluations must be carried out to estimate the cost of 'down time' in order to be able to effectively deal with this issue. It is also important to recognise the range of reliability requirements of data. For example, mission critical data may require high levels of System Fault Tolerance (SFT).
There is a tendency in technical consultants for overkill in this area. While it is nice have Duplexed Fileservers supporting Symmetric Multiple Processors (SMP) and RAID Level 6, many businesses may require generic, easily replaced hardware with an effective and well tested backup strategy.
It is also important that sufficient 'head room' be incorporated in the network's capacity so that future expansions can be catered for. This is especially important for media as it is an easy task to replace a component such as a router for a new model with higher switching speed, but it is not feasible to rewire a building with Cat 5 UTP to replace current wiring.
These items are not meant to represent an exhaustive list of factors to consider/evaluate in evaluating the feasibility of system requirements. Other items relating to specialised applications (eg: database servers) or local environmental issues will also need to be dealt with. The golden rule in all feasibility studies is to evaluate the benefits of a feature versus the costs of implementing and maintaining that feature.
Determine the required functional and performance characteristics of the communications components of the proposed system.
This assessment criterion focuses on the requirement of the technical consultant to match the technical measurements of media and hardware against the required outcomes as embodied in the proposed system.
The scope of this area is particularly broad as it deals with the physical topology of a LAN including Media, NIC’s Bridges, Brouters, Routers and Hubs as well as client and server hardware.
Important points for consideration in some of these areas are:
· Once topology is evaluated, this may effect media choice. Here capacities, attenuation, ease of installation and susceptibility to EMI of each media type must be in the forefront of the consultant’s mind.
All of these must then be matched for cost and suitability. Using the table below you will be able to provide media specifications:
Cable |
Variety |
Cost |
Attenuation |
Capacity |
Attenuation |
EMI Susceptibility |
UTP |
Cat 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cat 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
STP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coax |
RG8/or RG11 (thick) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
RG58 (thin) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
RG62 (Arcnet) |
|
|
|
|
|
Fibre Optics |
FDDI |
|
|
|
|
|
· A sensible approach is to install media which exceeds current capacity and EMI requirements. This is especially relevant to mission critical components such as a back-bone between LAN’s. Please note, however, that theoretical capacity does not necessarily match operational capacity.
· Repeaters, being simple regeneration devices from OSI Physical Layer are media dependent, protocol independent. Hubs (concentrators) can be active, passive or intelligent depending upon a network’s requirements, but are also normally media dependent and protocol independent. Specialised hubs called MAU’s will be required for token ring implementations.
· Bridges are normally used for isolating segments with heavy local traffic. Being from the OSI data link layer, they are media dependent, protocol independent.
· Routers use logical addresses, route selection and discovery from the network layer, and are therefore the most complex and slowest of the devices.
· Be aware that as complexity, intelligence and functionality increase, cost increases and performance decreases.
Other specialised equipment such as CSU/DSU, multiplexers and gateways may be required depending on the situation.
Determine the required functional and performance characteristics of the network software components of the proposed system, matching technical measurements of logical topology/protocols, etc
Areas requiring evaluation include NIC drivers, Network Operating System (NOS) and Media Contention Protocols. Factors to consider in each of these include:
· Versatility - being able to copy with a variety of media types, connectivity devices (eg: bridges, routers), protocols (eg: IPX/SPX, TCP/IP) and contention protocols (eg: token ring).
· Performance - A NOS minimal overhead processing will perform better and be easier to maintain.
· Security - The range of security types and levels is of vital importance.
· Fault Tolerance and Redundancy - should constantly verify data, accommodate duplexing RAID and backup devices.
· Management - A range of management utilities available even when problems occur. The management of multiple servers and client types is important.
· Industry Acceptance - Where is it being used and by whom.
· Service and Backup - Must be available on demand.
Once again, these items represent areas for consideration rather than forming a definite checklist.
Write clear and complete logical network specifications.
The layout and content of network specifications will vary depending upon organisational requirements, network type and location.
They should, however, be clear, unambiguous, concise and complete. They should describe the benefits, layout, functionality, technical characteristics and components (not equipment) of the networking solution.
The layout given below is not meant to be prescriptive, but rather to promote ideas and discussions as to the individual network specifications.
Title |
|
Client |
|
Author |
|
Version |
|
Date |
|
System Benefits |
This provides the link between a business’ proposed system and these network specs |
Operational Description |
Here the consultant summarises the system contained in these specs (eg: NOS, topology, etc) |
Physical Topology |
Best completed with diagram and descriptive text. should clearly identify segments |
Operational Characteristics |
|
Media Used |
What cable standards and connectors |
Connectivity |
What other systems will it have to interface with |
Client Specs |
Client hardware characteristics |
Server Specs |
Server hardware characteristics |
Security |
Summarise known threats and network solutions for each |
Performance |
Include best/worst/average capacities and response times |
Redundancy/Fault Tolerance |
Describe features to be included for each (eg: duplexing drives) |
Backup & Disaster Recovery |
Indicate number, type and frequency of backups and outline of disaster recover procedures |
Documentation |
Indicate documentation types required |
Training |
Indicate level of training required |
Maintenance & Support |
Indicate preferred maintenance contract, staff levels, response times, etc. Identify mission critical components. |
System Cost and Implementation Outline |
Estimated costs and time to implement would be required as an informative guide to management |